Cases 41 - 50 of 169
Thompson v. Cambrex Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01793
Defendant:
Louis J. Grabowsky, Bernard Hampl, Ilan Kaufthal and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
STEIN v. CAMBREX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv18106
Defendant:
BERNHARD HAMPL, LOUIS J. GRABOWSKY, KATHRYN RUDIE HARRIGAN, PH.D. and others
Plaintiff:
SHIVA STEIN
Plumley v. Amber Road, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01053
Defendant:
Pamela F. Craven, Eagle Parent Holdings, LLC, Barry M. V. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
FABIAN et al v. SHENKAN et al
as 2:2019cv00582
Plaintiff:
FABIAN LEGAL SERVICES, LLC. and RUDY FABIAN
Defendant:
SHENKAN INJURY LAWYERS, LLC. and RICHARD E. SHENKAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AQUILIO v. TOWNSHIP OF MONTVILLE et al
as 2:2019cv09752
Defendant:
RUDY APPELMAN, ANDREW CAGGIANO and TOWNSHIP OF MONTVILLE
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM AQUILIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FLORES v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv08106
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
RUDY FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rudis Gutierrez-Molina v. Attorney General United States
as 19-1374
Petitioner:
RUDIS ERNESTO GUTIERREZ-MOLINA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ESTRADA v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv04935
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, and MERCK & CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
RUDY ESTRADA, JR.
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUDY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv02120
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL RUDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
