Cases 1 - 10 of 757
Glover v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jeff Glover
Defendant:
C/O Brown, C/O Swedias, Warden Hutching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raudel v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00391
Petitioner:
Ulysses Ruiz Raudel
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Goodwin v. Gomez et al
as 2:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Patrick Glenn Goodwin and Patrick Glen Goodwin
Defendant:
A. Gomez, A. Hidalgo, L. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ruiz
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand and Karrisa Currier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
George Willie Buford, III
Defendant:
Unknown Gutierrez, Unknown Farruggia, Unknown Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Campbell v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Campbell
Defendant:
Ruiz and Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Woods v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Aaron Earl Woods
Defendant:
Gena Jones and Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz et al v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Debra Morales Ruiz and Alex George Chavez
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ruiz v. Nieto et al
as 2:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Enrique Pena Nieto, Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda, Jesus Gabriel Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2023cv01790
Plaintiff:
Robert Young
Defendant:
J. Ruiz, Abrams and Tate William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
