Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Anderson v. State University of New York (SUNY) et al
as 1:2024cv02083
Plaintiff: Captain D.C. Anderson
Defendant: State University of New York (SUNY), Columbia University, Rutgers University and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richard Peamon v. Rutgers University Press
as 24-1124
Plaintiff: RICHARD PEAMON
Defendant: RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS
KNAPP et al v. INDIVIOR, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff: MR. GUY KNAPP, MR. WILLIAM KNAPP and MR. PHILLIP L. MILLER
Defendant: INDIVIOR, INC., AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC., RECKITT BENCKISER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv23041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20707
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peamon v. Rutgers University Press Ect.
as 1:2023cv02128
Plaintiff: Richard Peamon
Defendant: Rutgers University Press Ect.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
DIAMONTE v. HENDERSON et al
as 2:2023cv03596
Plaintiff: MARIA DIAMONTE
Defendant: Taja Nia Henderson, Kim Perry, Gary Farnese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
J. C. v. David Locha, et al
as 23-2013
Plaintiff / Appellant: J. C., individually, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID LOCHA, DAVID L. HENRIQUEZ, NICHOLAS EPISCOPO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02597
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?