Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Defenders of Wildlife v. Burgum, et al.
as 26-5672
Plaintiff:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant:
DOUG BURGUM, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, BRIAN NESVIK, in his official capacity as the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, KING COVE CORPORATION, an Alaska Native Village Corporation and others
Defenders of Wildlife v. Burgum et al
as 3:2026cv00298
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Brian Nesvik, King Cove Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Mark Garfield Anderson et al v. American Family Connect Insurance Agency Inc.
as 2:2026cv01939
Plaintiff:
Mark Garfield Anderson and Jeremy Ryan Anderson
Defendant:
American Family Connect Insurance Agency Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Anderson v. Doe
as 5:2026cv05631
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anderson
Defendant:
John Doe doing business as EXXCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4 et al v. Hillstar Promotions, Ltd. et al
as 1:2026cv00724
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4, Gregg Smith, Paul Canning and others
Defendant:
Hillstar Promotions, Ltd. and William Hilliker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Carlos Thurman v. Cookie Crews, et al
as 26-5241
Plaintiff:
CARLOS L. THURMAN
Defendant:
COOKIE CREWS, ALLYSON LAMBERT, TIM LANE and others
Ryan Anderson v. Mary Lauck
as 26-1060
Plaintiff:
RYAN ANDERSON
Defendant:
JUDGE M. HANNAH LAUCK, Chief U. S. District Court Judge
Ryan Anderson v. US
as 26-1058
Plaintiff:
RYAN ANDERSON
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
