Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
RABA et al v. US Attorney General et al
as 4:2025cv10708
Plaintiff:
Laith Issa RABA and Rina Hadweh
Defendant:
US Attorney General, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director of and Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Page (PS) v. Boggess et al
as 1:2023cv03431
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Page
Defendant:
Joshua Boggess, Waseline, Rabas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
Barbara Raba and Uknown
Defendant:
Jared E. Dye, DMD and Oral Surgey Associates, P.C. d/b/a Oral Surgery & Implant Specialist
OMS National Insurance Company v. Raba
as 1:2023cv02050
Plaintiff:
OMS National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Barbara Raba
Murphy v. Pollard et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Desmond Murphy
Defendant:
Thomas Pollard, CO Christopher Osgood, Charles Weiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy, Desmond v. Pollard, Thomas et al
as 3:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Desmond Murphy
Defendant:
Thomas Pollard, Christopher Osgood, Charles Weiley and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raba v. Dye et al
as 4:2021cv04192
Plaintiff:
Barbara Raba
Defendant:
Jared E. Dye and Oral Surgery & Implant Specialists
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RABA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10032
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PETER RABA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
