Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Page (PS) v. Boggess et al
as 1:2023cv03431
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Page
Defendant:
Joshua Boggess, Waseline, Rabas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
Barbara Raba and Uknown
Defendant:
Jared E. Dye, DMD and Oral Surgey Associates, P.C. d/b/a Oral Surgery & Implant Specialist
OMS National Insurance Company v. Raba
as 1:2023cv02050
Plaintiff:
OMS National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Barbara Raba
Murphy v. Pollard et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Desmond Murphy
Defendant:
Thomas Pollard, CO Christopher Osgood, Charles Weiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy, Desmond v. Pollard, Thomas et al
as 3:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Desmond Murphy
Defendant:
Thomas Pollard, Christopher Osgood, Charles Weiley and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raba v. Dye et al
as 4:2021cv04192
Plaintiff:
Barbara Raba
Defendant:
Jared E. Dye and Oral Surgery & Implant Specialists
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RABA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10032
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PETER RABA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chong Lee v. City of Appleton, Wisconsin, et al
as 21-1310
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CARRIE SCHNEIDER, MICHAEL GOSTISHA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHONG L. LEE
Lee v. Appleton Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00765
Defendant:
Cary Meyer, DA Carrie Schneider, Neal Rabas and others
Plaintiff:
Chong L Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv04618
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Raba, Peter Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
