Cases 1 - 10 of 552
Rachel Goode v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11221
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GOODE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Ernest v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Rachel Ernest
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Rachel M Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carhart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2024cv02634
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Carhart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bassick v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Rachel Bassick
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Darch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05192
Plaintiff:
Rachel Darch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Levengood v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Rachel Teresa Levengood
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walz v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Rachel Walz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lord v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Rachel Lord
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Abstance v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Rachell Logan Abstance
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
