Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Walz v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Rachel Walz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lord v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Rachel Lord
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Porter v. Sports & Social [ECI]
as 4:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Rachel A. Porter
Defendant:
Sports & Social [ECI]
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Jason Lewis, Travis Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Linzy v. Mr. Bult's Inc.
as 4:2023cv01247
Plaintiff:
Rachel Linzy
Defendant:
Mr. Bult's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv06126
Plaintiff:
Rachel Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Donovan v. Heartland Regional Medical Center d/b/a Mosaic Life Care et al
as 5:2023cv06127
Plaintiff:
Devin Donovan
Defendant:
Heartland Regional Medical Center d/b/a Mosaic Life Care, Rachel Dunston, Matthew Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gaines v. Windsor C-1 School Board et al
as 4:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gaines
Defendant:
Windsor C-1 School Board, Dr. Rachel Montgomery, Dr. Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Workman v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05069
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rachelle Workman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
