Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kaur, D.D.S. et al v. Jeorgos et al
as 1:2024cv10548
Plaintiff:
Amandeep Kaur, D.D.S. and Amandeep Kaur, D.D.S. P.C.
Defendant:
Elvisa Jeorgos, Tyanna Yaman, Aparna Khanna, D.M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jaiswal v. Chaturvedi et al
as 1:2023cv11388
Plaintiff:
Arvind Kumar Jay Jaiswal
Defendant:
Rahul Chaturvedi and Moolex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaiswal v. Chaturvedi et al
as 1:2023cv10128
Plaintiff:
Arvind Kumar Jay Jaiswal
Defendant:
Rahul Chaturvedi and Moolex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jaiswal v. Chaturvedi
as 1:2021cv11403
Plaintiff:
Arvind Kumar Jay Jaiswal
Defendant:
Rahul Chaturvedi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridge Over Corporation et al v. Chaturvedi
as 1:2021cv11278
Plaintiff:
Bridge Over Corporation, Siddharth Siddharth and Meera Siddharth
Defendant:
Rahul Chaturvedi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ascend Capital LLC v. Moolex, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10972
Defendant:
Jane Doe & John Doe, Inc., Rahul Chaturvedi and Moolex, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ascend Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10099
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Chaturvedi v. Siddharth et al
as 1:2020cv11880
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Narinder Thind, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Rahul Chaturvedi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAMBERS v. NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11822
Plaintiff:
SCOTT D. CHAMBERS
Defendant:
Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC, Ameridose LLC , Liberty Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. RED HAWK INDUSTRIES, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv11159
Defendant:
RED HAWK INDUSTRIES, LLC, RAHUL GHAI and HAROLD FOLSOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
