Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Younkin et al
as 7:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Glen Younkin, John S. Edwards, R. Creigh Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Northam
as 3:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Kenneth Newkirk
Respondent:
Ralph Northam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Chapman et al
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ray Brooks
Defendant:
Tonya D. Chapman, Kemba Smith Pradia, A. Lincoln James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Northam et al
as 7:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Northam, Glenn Youngkin, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Northam et al
as 3:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, II
Defendant:
M.D. Ralph Northam, Virginia Department of Healthcare Professionals, Saint Mary's Hospital (Bon Secours) Emergency Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bubimlya v. Northam et al
as 1:2021cv01009
Plaintiff:
Jason Brent Bubimlya and Jason Brent Budimlya
Defendant:
Ralph Northam, Harold Clark and A. David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bubimlya v. Northam et al
as 7:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jason Brent Bubimlya and Jason Brent Budimlya
Defendant:
Ralph Northam, Harold Clark and A. David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAHIR v. HOGAN et al
as 3:2021cv00547
Plaintiff:
Naja Talibah Zahir
Defendant:
Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr., Governor of Virginia Ralph Northam, James Mountcastle and others
Trustee:
Queen Naja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
