Cases 21 - 30 of 140
US v. Gasper Ramirez
as 21-4655
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GASPER RAMIREZ, a/k/a Casper
Ramirez Arnal v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Plaintiff:
Fernando Henrique Ramirez Arnal
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
US v. Jose Soto-Ramirez
as 21-4553
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE SOTO-RAMIREZ
US v. Noe Ramirez-Guardado
as 21-7288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NOE DAVID RAMIREZ-GUARDADO, a/k/a Tricky
NFM, Inc. v. Paris et al
as 1:2021cv02277
Plaintiff:
NFM, Inc.
Defendant:
Brian Paris, Edgar Ramirez, Michael Indaburu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
LAGOS-AGUILERA et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2021cv01899
Plaintiff:
Delmer LAGOS-AGUILERA, Sandra MEJIA-MARTINEZ, Jairo ROSALES-CERRATO and others
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Acting Secretary Tracy Renaud, Susan Dibbins and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Connor v. Complete Reservation Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02151
Plaintiff:
Jay Connor
Defendant:
Complete Reservation Solutions, LLC, Sean Engler, Leonides Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Maria Romero-Ramirez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1665
Petitioner:
MARIA LISSET ROMERO-RAMIREZ and A.L.V.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Ramirez de Cisneros et al v. Renaud et al
as 1:2021cv00678
Plaintiff:
Migdonio Cisneros Portillo and Luz Maria Ramirez de Cisneros
Defendant:
Director, USCIS NBC Robert M. Cowan and Acting Director Tracy Renaud
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
US v. Jesus Ramirez-Barrera
as 21-6374
Defendant / Appellant:
JESUS RAMIREZ-BARRERA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
