Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Soto v. HBL Beauty & Co LLC
as 1:2024cv02479
Plaintiff:
Ramon Soto
Defendant:
HBL Beauty & Co LLC d/b/a PurelyWhite Deluxe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rand et al v. Eyemart Express LLC
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Rand, Esperanza Gottschau and Ramon Soto
Defendant:
Eyemart Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disla et al v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv06693
Plaintiff:
Delvy Disla, Ronnell Dusauzay, Justin Capote and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Soto v. USA
as 2:2022cv00243
Petitioner:
Cruz Flechita Ramon Soto
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05432
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26654
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saad Maura, et al v. Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, et al
as 20-1114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMARIS TORRES-NUNEZ, EVELYN MORALEZ-SUAREZ, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP BERRIOS-RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BANCO SANTANDER DE PUERTO RICO, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
WMPRRE LLC and SUNWEST MORTGAGE COMPANY INC.
United States of America v. Soto
as 4:2017cv00837
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ramon Soto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
USA v. Cruz Ramon Soto
as 16-30236
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CRUZ FLECHITA RAMON SOTO
Soto v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02781
Movant:
Ramon Soto
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
