Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sullivan et al v. The Andover Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv12056
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sullivan, Kelley Sullivan, I.S. 2018 and others
Defendant:
The Andover Police Department, Katie Ramos, Michael A. Lindstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ramos v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv40105
Plaintiff:
Nicole Marie Ramos
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ramos v. Social Security Administation
as 1:2021cv11895
Plaintiff:
Alicia Ramos
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lainez et al v. Matarazzo Brothers, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv11462
Plaintiff:
Nora Lainez, Silvia Nunez and Betsy Ramos
Defendant:
Matarazzo Brothers, LLC and Anthony Aresco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2021cv11117
Plaintiff:
Rashard Brown
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Thomas A Turco, III, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mailloux v. City of Leominster et al
as 4:2021cv40007
Defendant:
Juan D Ramos, Matthew J DiPerri and City of Leominster
Plaintiff:
Roger R Mailloux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Lincoln-Sudbury Regional School Committee et al
as 1:2020cv11564
Defendant:
Bella Wong, Sandy Crawford, Peter Elenbaas and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10685
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos v. Target Corporation
as 1:2019cv12387
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Charles Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
