Cases 1 - 10 of 19
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15150
Plaintiff:
RANDY ROBERTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Washington v. Douglas County, Kansas et al
as 2:2023cv02063
Plaintiff:
Rontarus Washington
Defendant:
Douglas County, Kansas, Charles E. Branson, Jay Armbrister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. County of Cook through Cermak Health Services of Cook County et al
as 1:2021cv04436
Plaintiff:
Randy Roberts
Defendant:
County of Cook through Cermak Health Services of Cook County, Cook County Sheriff Dart J Thomas, Officer K. Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2020cv02520
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office, Jay Armbrister, Randy Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2020cv02522
Defendant:
Chase Reiling, Cory Roberson, Jay Armbrister and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv02465
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Catherine Roberts and Randy Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Otts v. Mask et al
as 3:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Phillip T Otts and Phillip Terry Otts
Defendant:
Jason Collier, Randy Roberts, Leonard Mask and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickstrom et al v. Moose Lake, City of et al
as 0:2018cv02521
Defendant:
Moose Lake, City of, John and Jane Does, Pine County and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Elmer Wickstrom and Bridie Anne Wickstrom
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2724
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Roberts v. Mars Petcare Us, Inc.
as 17-507
Petitioner:
RANDY ROBERTS
Respondent:
MARS PETCARE US, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
