Cases 11 - 20 of 25
United States of Amercia v. Marlin, 883, .22 caliber rifle, serial number 10647660 et al
as 1:2011cv00222
Plaintiff:
United States of Amercia
Defendant:
Marlin, 883, .22 caliber rifle, serial number 10647660, Marlin, 917, .17 caliber rifle, serial number 91635698, New England, Westinghouse M91, 7.62 caliber rifle, serial number 3965 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. One Bryco Arms 38 Pistol, .380 Caliber, Serial No. 083719 et al
as 1:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Bryco Arms 38 Pistol, .380 Caliber, Serial No. 083719, One Davis Industries P-380 Pistol, .380 Caliber, Serial No. AP213663, One Winchester Ranger Shotgun, 12 Gauge, Serial No. N1017350 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States Of America v. $654.00 More or Less in United States Currency et al
as 6:2010cv00343
Defendant:
$654.00 More or Less in United States Currency, 1992 Wells Trailer VIN: 1WC200D16N20188, 1994 Nissan Pickup VIN: 1N6SD16S1RC301462 and others
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. One 2007 Ford Ranger et al
as 1:2010cv03294
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2007 Ford Ranger, $1,100 in United States Currency, $342 in United States Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 1988 BMW, VIN #WBAGC8311J2767674, et al.
as 3:2009cv00436
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1988 BMW, VIN #WBAGC8311J2767674, et al., 1998 Lincoln Town Car VIN#1LNFM82W6WY665246, 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche VIN #3GNEC12T74G248765 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Ford Ranger, One 2007, Vin #1FTYR10D57PA89969
as 3:2009cv00634
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ford Ranger, One 2007, Vin #1FTYR10D57PA89969
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States v. Northshore Mining Co.
as 08-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, State of Wisconsin, Save Lake Superior Association and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Michigan and City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellee:
Northshore Mining Company
Intervenor Defendant:
County of Lake, Minnesota, Northeastern Minnesota Development Association, Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce and others
United States v. Northshore Mining Co.
as 08-1533
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, State of Wisconsin and Save Lake Superior Association
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Minnesota and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Michigan and City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellee:
Northshore Mining Company
Intervenor Defendant:
County of Lake, Minnesota, Northeastern Minnesota Development Association, Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce and others
United States of America v. $33,196.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 1:2008cv00251
Defendant:
$33,196.00 in U.S. Currency and 2002 White Ford Ranger
Claimant:
Gustavo Alderete-Lopez, Wilfredo Ortiz, Claudia Alvarado and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States v. Northshore Mining Co.
as 08-1423
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, State of Wisconsin, Save Lake Superior Association and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, State of Michigan and City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellant:
Northshore Mining Company
Intervenor Defendant:
County of Lake, Minnesota, Northeastern Minnesota Development Association, Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
