Cases 1 - 10 of 245
Rani Allan v. Daniel Gigi
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
RANI ALLAN
Defendant:
DANIEL NATHAN GIGI, SHLOMO GIGI, ARLINGTON COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Rani Bolton, et al v. Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc., et al
as 24-10084
Plaintiff:
RANI BOLTON, ALISON MERCKER, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
Defendant:
INLAND FRESH SEAFOOD CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC., JOEL KNOX, BILL DEMMOND and others
Suthrave et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ramesh Suthrave and Sandhya Rani Suthrave
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singh, et al. v. Garland
as 24-9
Petitioner:
PRABHJOT SINGH, TOSHA RANI and GURFATEH SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Sajnani
as 8:2023cv03404
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Defendant:
Rani Sajnani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rani et al v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv03986
Plaintiff:
Geeta Rani, Rishipal Singh, Mithless Mithless and others
Defendant:
Oscar A Rivera, Veeco Holdings, LLC and Veeco Holdings, LLC doing business as Veeco Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rani Foods, LP v. Rani Foods, LLC
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Rani Foods, LP
Defendant:
Rani Foods, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
