Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00303
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00450
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01868
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00550
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv02812
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wobig v. Velocity Investments, LLC et al
as 0:2008cv04897
Plaintiff: Treston Wobig
Defendant: Velocity Investments, LLC and Rausch, Sturm, Israel & Hornik, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Washington v. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services America LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv00698
Plaintiff: Nathan Washington
Defendant: DaimlerChrysler Financial Services America LLC, Rausch, Sturm, Israel & Hornik, S.C. and Shakopee Dodge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lopez et al v. Rausch, Sturm, Israel & Hornik, S.C. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2007cv04941
Plaintiff: Mark Lopez and Florence Lopez
Defendant: Rausch, Sturm, Israel & Hornik, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00644
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?