Cases 1 - 10 of 57
In re: Ari Bailey, et al
as 18-1956
Petitioner:
In re: ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAUERS and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
BARRERA-AVILA v. WATTS et al
as 2:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
JESUS BARRERA-AVILA
Defendant:
Harrell Watts , Raymond E. Holt , John V. Flournoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Holmes v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 16-11596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES COURY HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, RAYMOND E. HOLT, JOHN V. FLOURNOY and others
Eduardo Perez v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 16-10961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDUARDO RUBEN PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, Counsel, National Inmate Appeals Coordinator, FBOP, RAYMOND E. HOLT, Reg. Counsel, Regional Administrative Appeal Coordinator, FBOP, SUZANNE R. HASTINGS, Warden (Retired), FCI Jesup and others
Fernandez-Torres v. Watts et al
as 2:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manuel Fernandez-Torres
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, Anthony Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davilla v. Watts et al
as 2:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Anthony Davilla
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, D. Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES v. WATTS et al
as 2:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
James Coury Holmes
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, John V. Flournoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Joyce K. Conley, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRERA-AVILA v. WATTS et al
as 1:2015cv01715
Plaintiff:
JESUS BARRERA-AVILA
Defendant:
HARRELL WATTS, RAYMOND E. HOLT, JOHN V. FLOURNOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. WATTS et al
as 1:2015cv01421
Plaintiff:
JAMES COURY HOLMES
Defendant:
HARRELL WATTS, RAYMOND E. HOLT, JOHN V FLOURNOY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
