Cases 1 - 10 of 28
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80035
Not Yet Classified:
Naturalization Ceremony, Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao and others
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80044
Not Yet Classified:
Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao, Emma Baran and others
Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00073
Petitioner:
Raymondo Rodriguez and Raymundo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00211
Petitioner:
Raymundo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2021cv00330
Petitioner:
Raymundo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Jose Rodriguez-Yanez
as 20-50729
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Raymundo Rodriguez-Yanez, also known as Reymundo Rodriquez, also known as Jose Reymundo Rodriquez, also known as Jose Rodriquez, also known as Jose Raymundo Yaez, also known as Jose Raymundo Rodriguez, also known as Jose/ Rodriguez Yanez, also k
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Daniel Caddy v. Reymundo Rodriguez Jinez, et al
as 5:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Raymundo Rodriguez Jinez and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Caddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv01167
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reyna Rodriguez v. William Barr
as 19-1887
Petitioner:
REYNA LUZ RODRIGUEZ and GRISELDA SUSANA RAYMUNDO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Corella v. AAA Demolition, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ruiz Corella
Defendant:
Gary J. Goodemote, Raymundo Rodriguez, John J. Gotejen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
