Cases
Taylor v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv06906
Plaintiff: Reggie Taylor
Defendant: USAA Casualty Insurance Company and USAA General Indemnity Company
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Taylor v. Board of Parole
as 3:2020cv00123
Plaintiff: Reggie Taylor
Defendant: Board of Parole and Tennessee Dpt. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truslow et al v. Cook We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00119
Plaintiff: Dakota Truslow, Terance Hudson, Dominic Brown and others
Defendant: Doug Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truslow et al v. Cook
as 3:2016mc00010
Plaintiff: Dakota Truslow, Terance Hudson, Dominic Brown and others
Defendant: Doug Cook
TAYLOR et al v. 3M COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv80102
Plaintiff: REGGY TAYLOR, KATHY LANE and ROBERT M. TAYLOR
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, CYTEC ENGINEERED MATERIALS INC., LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. and others
Cross Claimant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cross Defendant: REGGY TAYLOR, KATHY LANE and ROBERT M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Reggy Taylor, et al. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., et al.
as TXW/1:08-CV-00017
Plaintiff: Reggy Taylor
Defendant: Lucent Technologies, Inc
Taylor et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2008cv00017
Plaintiff: Reggy Taylor, Kathy Lane and Robert M. Taylor
Defendant: 3M Company, Cytec Engineered Materials Inc., Lucent Technologies Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Batz et al v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00901
Plaintiff: Buddy Batz, Buddy Batz, Buddy Batz and others
Defendant: Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?