Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reginald Harvey v. TN, et al
as 19-6434
Defendant / Appellee:
INVESTIGATOR JOHN DOE #2, Chattanooga Police Department, OFFICER [UNKNOWN] WISE, Badge # 1690, OFFICER JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD CHARLES HARVEY
HARVEY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 4:2019cv00245
Plaintiff:
Reginald Charles Harvey
Defendant:
JENNIFER BAXTER, Mike McCarty, Christopher Guay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2019cv00162
Plaintiff:
REGINALD CHARLES HARVEY
Defendant:
JENNIFER BAXTER, MIKE MCCARTY, CHRISTOPHER GUAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. State of Georgia et al
as 6:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Reginald Charles Harvey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, LaChandra Smith, Shawn Sikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Georgia et al
as 6:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Grady Renard Williams, Jr. and Reginald Charles Harvey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00297
Petitioner:
Reginald Charles Harvey
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Mark Bender, P Ego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2016cv00233
Petitioner:
Reginald Charles Harvey
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Jim Wilbanks, Bryan Rayburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
State of Tennessee v. Harvey
as 1:2015mc00008
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee
Defendant:
Reginald Charles Harvey
State of Tennessee v. Harvey
as 1:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee
Defendant:
Reginald Charles Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Harvey et al v. M&T Bank et al
as 1:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
Reginald Charles Harvey, Micheal A. Smith and Erika L. Smith
Defendant:
M&T Bank , Bank of America , MERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
