Cases 1 - 9 of 9
USA v. Reginald Stephens
as 23-1464
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
REGINALD STEPHENS
STEPHENS et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv04100
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
ANNIE STEPHENS and REGINALD STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEPHENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06502
Plaintiff:
REGINALD STEPHENS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Andrews et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02048
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews , Daisy Barnes , Kissie Carnathan and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2014cv02071
Plaintiff:
Reginald Stephen Carr
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Jason Lingrich, L. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Reginald Stephen
as 13-4552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REGINALD STEPHENS, a/k/a Big Red
ANDREWS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04632
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANDREWS , GLADYS ANDREWS , AARON BEASLEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC, RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews et al v. National Football League et al.,
as 1:2012cv05633
Plaintiff:
William Andrews , Gladys Andrews , Aaron Beasley and others
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Properties LLC, Riddell, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Padula
as 9:2008cv03528
Petitioner:
Reginald Stephens
Respondent:
A J Padula
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
