Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Gordon v. Regional Transit Authority
as 24-30128
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gordon
Defendant:
Regional Transit Authority and XYZ Insurance Company
Howell v. Leahy, et al
as 23-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LEAHY, Mayor of Lowell, SOKHARY CHAU, Mayor of Lowell, RICHARD CESARZ, Lowell Police Officer and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM SAMARAS, City of Council, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LOWELL, MA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01571
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Howell v. Leahy, et al
as 23-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LEAHY, Mayor of Lowell, SOKHARY CHAU, Mayor of Lowell, RICHARD CESARZ, Lowell Police Officer and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM SAMARAS, City of Council, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LOWELL, MA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howell v. Lowell Regional Transit Authority
as 23-1514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWELL REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gordon v. Regional Transit Authority et al
as 2:2023cv01840
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gordon
Defendant:
Regional Transit Authority, XYZ Insurance Companies and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
