Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Tufano v. Better Life Foods Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00939
Plaintiff:
Frank Tufano
Defendant:
Better Life Foods Inc., Eat Prima, Santa Cruz Paleo, Inc., PowerPluck LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Williams (Rodriguez)
as 25-2891
Defendant:
MARKELL WILLIAMS, JEREMY WILLIAMS, RANDY JONES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pitts et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11453
Plaintiff:
Fatimah Pitts, Stephen Pivarnik, Betty Pledger and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Williams
as 25-1862
Defendant:
JEREMY WILLIAMS, RANDY JONES, PAUL AYALA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Jackson)
as 25-283
Defendant:
MESSIAH JACKSON, JEREMY WILLIAMS, RANDY JONES and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (White)
as 25-80
Defendant:
OCTAVIOUS GRIFFIN, JEREMY WILLIAMS, THOMAS RODRIGUEZ and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Markell Williams)
as 24-3150
Defendant:
Two, 15, MARKELL WILLIAMS and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Prince, Rollo v. Meisner, Michael
as 3:2022cv00018
Petitioner:
State Ex Rello Prince and Rollo Prince
Defendant:
Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Rellos, et al
as 21-1158
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM RELLOS, GEORGIA RELLOS and MARIA RELLOS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHLEY MCDANIEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
