Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Ashish Acharjee v. Sheriff Department of Riverside County et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ashish Acharjee
Defendant:
Sheriff Department of Riverside County, Remington, Office of District Attorney of Riverside County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Richards v. Remington et al
as 4:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Victoria Richards
Defendant:
Ryan T Remington and Tucson, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nancy Jane Geiger v. City of Huntington Beach et al
as 8:2019cv02299
Plaintiff:
Nancy Jane Geiger
Defendant:
Charles L Remington, Jr, City of Huntington Beach, Robert Handy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Marlon Campbell v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 18-55278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and CALVIN REMINGTON, individually and as Interim Chief Probation Officer for the Los Angeles County Probation Department
Remington v. Equifax Consumer Services
as 3:2015cv02251
Defendant:
Equifax Consumer Services
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Laverne Remington
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
