Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hobson (Morales) v. Billotte et al
as 3:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Clarksville Montgomery County Tennessee Sheriff Department, Kayla Billotte, Clarksville Montgomery County Tennessee Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Faye Rennell Hobson (Morales)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rennells v. City of Waukesha et al
as 2:2020cv01923
Defendant:
City of Waukesha, Brandon D Danowski, Nicholas S Hendriksen and others
Plaintiff:
Carl A Rennells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rennells v. City of Waukesha et al
as 2:2020cv01574
Defendant:
City of Waukesha, Brandon D Danowski, Nicholas S Hendricksen and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Rennells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobson et al v. Esper
as 3:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Mark T. Esper
Plaintiff:
Gladys Blount, Desma Blount, Faye Rennell Hobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Glover et al v. Rivas et al
as 2:2019cv13406
Defendant:
Michael Kennedy, Stacey Purdy, Nurse Bills and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Glover, R. G. and Richard Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobson v. Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison et al
as 3:2018cv00838
Defendant:
Scott P. Tift, Joshua A. Frank and Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison
Plaintiff:
Faye Rennell Hobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kirti Mehta v. Beaconridge Home Improvement A, et al
as 11-1505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRTI A. MEHTA
Defendant - Appellee:
BEACONRIDGE HOME IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION & ITS BOARD, TOM WANGLER, President; Individually & collectively as an employee, MARY M. RENNELS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
