Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Santos v. Unknown Respondent
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Andreuris Santos
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCDOWELL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv03635
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER E. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, THE OFFICE OF THE HOMELESS, APPLE TREE FAMILY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lawrence v. Federal Bureau of Prison (and its Co-Defenders) et al
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Xyavion Cortez Lawrence
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison (and its Co-Defenders), Warden Sage, Chainey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ABRAMSON v. RESPOND POWER, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
STEWART N. ABRAMSON
Defendant:
RESPOND POWER, LLC and MAJOR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC each d/b/a MAJOR ENERGY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
JOHNSON v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 2:2022cv01320
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Selmon v. Quay et al
as 3:2021cv01714
Petitioner:
Timothy M. Selmon
Respondent:
Warden Quay, Scott Biggers and Illegible Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. RESPONDING NURSE et al
as 2:2021cv04398
Plaintiff:
DONTE PACE ROBINSON
Defendant:
RESPONDING NURSE, CORRECTION OFFICIERS (1-4), LIEUTENANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VARGAS BRITO v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT(S)
as 3:2020cv00029
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT(S)
Petitioner:
LUIS ALEXANDER VARGAS BRITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vargas Brito v. Unnamed Respondent(s)
as 1:2020cv00283
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent(s)
Petitioner:
Luis Alexander Vargas Brito
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
