Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Medina v. Liakopoulos et al
as 1:2022cv05043
Plaintiff:
Miguel Medina
Defendant:
Christopher Liakopoulos, City of Chicago and Ruben Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynoso v. Endres et al
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Denorah Reynoso
Defendant:
Kyle Endres, Raleek Byfield, William Sherrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-56306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reynoso v. The United States Of America et al
as 3:2021cv02009
Plaintiff:
Elodia Reynoso
Defendant:
The United States of America and Does 1-10
Reynoso v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2021cv01566
Plaintiff:
Marcos A Reynoso
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, US Department of Justice and Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pepes, Inc. v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2021cv01646
Plaintiff:
Peps, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Peps Towing and Pepes, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Pepes Towing
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, John Valdivia, Theodore Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O. L. v. Liliana Jara, et al
as 21-55740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. L.
Defendant / Appellee:
LILIANA JARA, RICHARD RUIZ, CITY OF EL MONTE and others
Blackwell-Esters et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2021cv11586
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Blackwell-Esters and Tyrese Jackson
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Kayla Roe, Lamont Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
