Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Taylor v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv13545
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Taylor
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv03676
Plaintiff:
RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. INDIVIDUALLY AND doing business as UPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv03670
Plaintiff:
RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
TAYLOR et al
as 2:2022cv03668
Plaintiff:
RHONDA TAYLOR and TONYA ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Rhonda Taylor v. County of Riverside
as 5:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Taylor
Defendant:
County of Riverside and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Taylor v. Southern Fidelity Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Taylor
Defendant:
Southern Fidelity Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Taylor v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Davis v. Taylor
as 7:2021cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Rhonda Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Mitchell v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 2:2020cv01979
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Taylor Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
