Cases 1 - 10 of 341
CASTOR v. GALICH et al
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CASTOR
Defendant:
OFFICER DUSTIN GALICH, OFFICER JARRET KASPRYSZYN, OFFICER JOSHUA STEGENA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BANE v. Quiles-Rosa et al
as 2:2024cv02138
Plaintiff:
ALEX BANE
Defendant:
Detective Ricardo Quiles-Rosa and Detective JOSEPH GOMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Ricardo Ayala v. Syncreon. US, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04561
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ayala, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and Ricardo Ayala
Defendant:
Syncreon. US, Inc. and SYNCREON TECHNOLOGY (USA), LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
Townsend v. Rickard
as 1:2023cv01887
Petitioner:
Ricardo Townsend
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01917
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
NATIVIDAD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv03621
Plaintiff:
RICARDO NATIVIDAD
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE, JAMIE SORBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONDESIR et al v. CLARK et al
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MONDESIR and DESHNY DOR
Defendant:
JORDAN CLARK and PULLEN MOVING COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
