Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Townsend v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Ricardo Townsend
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Palmer v. City of Nevada, Iowa et al
as 4:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Clint Palmer
Defendant:
City of Nevada, Iowa, Ricardo Martinez II, Josh Cizmadia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Ramirez v. Wright Tree Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramirez
Defendant:
Wright Tree Service, Inc., ITC Holdings Corp., ITC Midwest, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bolden v. Iowa, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Petitioner:
Darrell Ricardo Bolden
Respondent:
Iowa, State of, Linn County Sheriff and Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00275
Petitioner:
Ricardo Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bolden v. McKinney et al
as 1:2019cv00032
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Iowa, State of and James McKinney
Petitioner:
Darrell Ricardo Bolden and Darrel Bolden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bolden v. Vander Sanden
as 1:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Jerry A Vander Sanden
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Bolden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv04050
Petitioner:
Ricardo Cruz-Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bowman v. City of Nevada Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2017cv00449
Plaintiff:
Holly Lynn Bowman
Defendant:
City of Nevada Department of Public Safety , Ricardo Martinez, II and Raymond Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
