Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Copeland v. Wal-Mart et al
as 2:2024cv11337
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Copeland
Defendant:
Wal-Mart and Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Early v. Callejas et al
as 2:2024cv11140
Plaintiff:
Olajuwan Early
Defendant:
Abigail Callejas, Jerome Warfield, Ricardo Moore and others
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mercado-Lozano v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Ricardo Mercado-Lozano and Heriberto Diaz-Lozano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Delgado et al
as 1:2024mc50151
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ricardo Delgado, II, Gregory Martin Hayes, Austin Antonio Saucedo and others
Petitioner:
Devica Thompson-Pratt
Stubbs v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv10129
Plaintiff:
Ricardo K. Stubbs
Defendant:
T. Jackson, A. Crawford and C. LaBreck
Stubbs #304356 v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ricardo K. Stubbs #304356
Defendant:
Michael Brown and Rachael Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cooper v. Canterbury-Miller et al
as 2:2022cv12921
Plaintiff:
Ricardo G. Cooper
Defendant:
Dianne M. Canterbury-Miller, Chris R. Reed and Gonzales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
