Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19911
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ARTHUR CHAVEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chavez v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
Richard A Chavez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Chavez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00596
Plaintiff:
Richard E Chavez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chavez v. Saul
as 2:2020cv01039
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Chavez and Richard A Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18093
Plaintiff:
RICHARD V CHAVEZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Richard Trevizo-Chavez
as 17-50242
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD TREVIZO-CHAVEZ, also known as Richard Chavez-Trevizo
Chavez v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02532
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Chavez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Richard Chavez v. David Jones, et al
as 13-11258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LUNA CHAVEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EARL JONES, Sheriff, DALE PEARCE, Chief Deputy, TODD ALLEN, Captain, Jail Commander and others
Chavez v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Richard Luna Chavez
Defendant:
David Jones, Dale Pearce, Todd Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Hatterman, et al
as 09-1252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD G. CHAVEZ
Defendant:
DARREN HATTERMAN, Adams County Deputy Sheriff, in his individual capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT CORTEZ, Adams County Deputy Sheriff, in his individual capacity and JOHN TOTTEN, Adams County Deputy Sheriff (Sgt.), in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
