Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12706
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DAVID DAVIS and RICHARD DAVID DAVIS, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08023
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85019
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD G. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02276
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41996
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv06897
Plaintiff:
Vicki L. Davis and Richard D. Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmerman et al v. Ace Bayou Corp. et al
as 5:2014cv00382
Plaintiff:
Andrew Simmerman and Terri Mills
Defendant:
Ace Bayou Corp. , Richard A. Davis , Murray S. Valene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ball-Hijazi et al v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02919
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ball-Hijazi, Deborah Ball-Hijazi, Deborah Ball-Hijazi and others
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Bausch & Lomb, Inc. and others
Special Master:
Daniel Capra
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ball-Hijazi et al v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
as 0:2008cv01100
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ball-Hijazi, Melissa Belcher, Mary Black and others
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
