Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Disability Rights Texas v. Alford
as 6:2019cv00391
Plaintiff: Disability Rights Texas
Defendant: Richard Alford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Favela v. Collier et al
as 9:2019cv00093
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff: Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Alford et al
as 6:2019cv00304
Respondent: Warden Richard Alford, Officer FNU Lockhart, Sgt. FNU Montgomery and others
Petitioner: Martin Darnell Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morgan v. Swicegood et al
as 1:2019cv00463
Defendant: Richard Alford, Erica Swicegood and T Chudej
Plaintiff: Michael Eugene Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favela v. Collier et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff: Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Johnson County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02497
Defendant: Richard Alford, Philip Roden, Robert Matson and others
Plaintiff: John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. United States of America
as 7:2018cv00075
Respondent: Richard Alford and United States of America
Petitioner: Victor Manuel Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Vondra et al
as 4:2017cv03308
Plaintiff: Aubrey Edgar Walker
Defendant: Charles Vondra and Richard Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Daigle et al
as 4:2016cv02227
Plaintiff: Floyd William Hall
Defendant: C S Daigle, Brian S Smith, Kelly Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Pittman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00263
Plaintiff: Robert Robertson
Defendant: William Pittman, Eric Briscoe, Richard Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?