Cases 81 - 90 of 1,165
Brown v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv01046
Plaintiff:
Richard Brown
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bristol v. Queens County
as 21-2167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcel C. Bristol
Defendant / Appellee:
Detective Daniel O'Brien, Detective Oneil Miller and Frank Horvath, Sgt.
Defendant:
Queens County, Queens County DA's Office, Richard Brown, DA and others
Intervenor:
Ms. Karen Johnson
Chambers v. Brown et al
as 3:2021cv00647
Plaintiff:
Jerry Chambers and Jerry Chambers, Jr
Defendant:
Richard Brown, Bean and Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Crouch v. Richard Brown, et al
as 21-2422
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY CROUCH
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, KEVIN GILMORE, JERRY SNYDER and others
Ronald Brown v. Donald Holbrook
as 21-35605
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD RICHARD BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34682
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Columbus Green Cabs, Inc
as 2:2021cv04017
Plaintiff:
Richard Brown
Defendant:
Columbus Green Cabs, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33482
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Thomas v. Richard Brown, et al
as 21-12475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD EARL THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, Clayton County Magistrate and AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
HUSPON v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00260
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMMON, RICHARD BROWN, RANDALL PURCELL and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY HUSPON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
