Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Church v. Spence et al
as 5:2019cv00838
Defendant:
Gary Sims, Dr. Marc Swanson and Shawn Spence
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Church, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devine v. Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
as 5:2018cv00148
Petitioner:
Richard Devine and Richard C. Devine
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Huttonsville and Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Basford et al
as 2:2016cv03212
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard C. Basford, II and The Charleston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stauch v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv04031
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Stauch
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parsons et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv28231
Plaintiff:
Susan Parsons and Richard C. Parsons
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neff et al v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
as 5:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Neff and Sharon L. Neff
Defendant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carruth et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv21893
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Carruth and Richard C. Carruth
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02256
Plaintiff:
Lisa Diane Roberts and Richard C. Roberts
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenter et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32878
Plaintiff:
Linda Carpenter and Richard C Carpenter, Sr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
