Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Severstal Wheeling, Inc. Retirement Committee et al v. WPN Corporation Capacity et al
as 1:2016mc00096
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Rogers, Melvin Baggett, William Drew Landon and others
Defendant:
WPN Corporation Capacity and Ronald Labow
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Severstal Wheeling Inc. Retirement Commmittee et al v. WPN Corporation et al
as 2:2016mc00036
Plaintiff:
Melvin Baggett, Richard Caruso, Timothy S Rogers and others
Defendant:
Ronald Labow and WPN Corporation
As Named Fiduciary Of The Wheeling Corrugating Co. Retirement Plan, The Salaried Employees Pension P:
William Drew Landon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CARUSO et al v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
as 2:2015cv00505
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN CARUSO and RICHARD CARUSO
Defendant:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv03831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Severstal Wheeling, Inc. Retirement Committee et al v. WPN Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00954
Plaintiff:
Severstal Wheeling, Inc. Retirement Committee, Timothy S. Rogers, Vincent D. Assetta and others
Defendant:
WPN Corporation, Ronald Labow and WHX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
