Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McCain et al v. D & R Construction and Contracting, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Michael McCain, James D. Hornsby and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
D & R Construction and Contracting, LLC and Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Harris v. Bias et al
as 3:2016cv01906
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris
Defendant:
Charles Bias, William Triplett, Jr., Ms. Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.H. v. Matti et al
as 3:2014cv00732
Plaintiff:
D.H. and Richard Harris
Defendant:
Todd Matti , Scotty Singleton , City of Brandenburg, Kentucky and others
Counter_claimant:
Todd Matti
Counter_defendant:
D.H. and Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mathis v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2012cv13736
Plaintiff:
James Mathis
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Richard Harris and Barry Hayward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v Detroit, City of etal.,
as 2:2011cv14111
Plaintiff:
Reginald Stevenson
Defendant:
Lavar Green , Johnny Fox , David Sander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heard v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv12287
Plaintiff:
Casadaria Heard
Defendant:
James Taylor and Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hughes v. Lavender et al
as 2:2011cv00446
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Hughes
Defendant:
George Lavender, T.J. Hollis, Mike Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Lavender, Jr. et al
as 2:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
James Lee Stewart
Defendant:
George Lavender, Jr. , Shawna Ott , Richard Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. Lavender, Jr. et al
as 2:2010cv01138
Plaintiff:
Larry Vincent Ferrell
Defendant:
George Lavender, Jr. , Richard Harris and K. Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
