Cases 31 - 40 of 172
Harris v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Warden Lane, Asst. Warden Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06771
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nichols v. Pope County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv01231
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Pope County Detention Center, Flagg, Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05268
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID E DESIDERIO, ASS'T. D.A. DAVID WEBB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Richard Bear Runner
as 21-3382
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Harris Bear Runner
Harris v. Cotte et al
as 2:2021cv00646
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris
Defendant:
James Cotte, John Doe and Gilbert Noe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2021cv03006
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0151
Harris et al v. Liberty Insurance Corporation
as 4:2021cv00222
Defendant:
Liberty Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Linda Harris and Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURKE, MANUEL SANTIAGO, THE ESTATE OF CHARLES PERMINT and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHALIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
