Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Corley v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Corley
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Curry v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Curry, II
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherbert et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04191
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Sherbert, Jerry Wayne Morris, Albert Mount and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Floyd et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02840
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory Floyd, William Paul Ernst, Larry Layne Eshleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
US v. Richard Bates
as 23-4248
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE BATES
Ricky Hefner v. State of North Carolina
as 23-6276
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY L. HEFNER, a/k/a Richard Lee Hefner
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Scott v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Scott
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
GRIFFITH v. BOP
as 1:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEE GRIFFITH
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hefner v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2021cv00317
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hefner and Ricky L. Hefner
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and North Carolina Dept. P.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luedtke v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00126
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Luedtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
