Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Lady Maakia Charlene Smith v. Richard Lisenbe, et al
as 22-2644
Plaintiff:
Bilal Hasanie Hill
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lady Maakia Charlene Smith, personal representative of the Estate of Bilal Hasanie Hill, deceased
Defendant:
Phelps County Sheriff's Department, Phelps County Jail, Richard Lisenbe, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Phelps County and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Arthur Bentley, individually and his official capacity as a Medical Services Provider at Phelps County, Dionne Kelley and Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.
Clark v. Phelps County et al
as 4:2020cv00716
Defendant:
Steve Lorts, Phelps County, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Sacorey Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Richard Lisenbe and Deon Kelley
Plaintiff:
Rex A. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Kelley et al
as 4:2018cv01989
Defendant:
Matt Schultz, Richard Lisenbe and Deon Kelley
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Lisenbe et al
as 4:2017cv02805
Plaintiff:
Travis Leroy Garner, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Lisenbe, Matt Shults and Steve Lorts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hales v. Grisham et al
as 4:2017cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert C Hales
Defendant:
Grisham, Joe Taylor and Richard Lisenbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hales v. Grisham et al
as 4:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Robert C Hales
Defendant:
Grisham, Joe Taylor and Richard Lisenbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen v. Lisenbe et al
as 4:2017cv01547
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Owen
Defendant:
Richard Lisenbe and Matt Shults
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen v. Lisenbe et al
as 4:2017cv00360
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Owen
Defendant:
Richard Lisenbe and Matt Shults
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen v. Bough et al
as 6:2017cv03110
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee Owen
Respondent:
Stephen Bough, Ami Harshad Patel-Miller, Brad Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
