Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Moore v. Transco Lines Inc
as 4:2021cv01156
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Defendant:
Transco Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Joseph Resch, et al v. Krapf's Coaches Inc
as 13-3947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA M. KING, JOSEPH RESCH, SCOTT BEINLICH and others
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELIZABETH MCNAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
KRAPF'S COACHES INC
Victor Jones v. TW & Company, et al
as 1:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Victor Jones
Defendant:
TW & Company , Tanya Walker , Richard Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. TW & COMPANY et al
as 1:2011at00449
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JONES
Defendant:
TW & COMPANY , TANYA WALKER, RICHARD MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN v. SUPERIOR ELEVATOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00224
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN and TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant:
SUPERIOR ELEVATOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC and RICHARD MOORE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alban et al v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2007cv01538
Plaintiff:
Alex Alban, Alex Alban, Kirk Askew and others
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority and Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis, et al v. Special Distribution, et al
as 4:2002cv04225
Plaintiff:
Tarence T Davis, Michael L Parrott, Charles E Alexander and others
Defendant:
Special Distribution Services Inc, A & G Truck Lines Inc, Special Dispatch of Houston Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
