Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DEL RIO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05967
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PHILIP DEL RIO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carder v. Lamb et al
as 1:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Stephen Carder
Defendant:
Billy Lamb, Sabrina Patterson, Richard Philips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Salander v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6021
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD PHILIP SALANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Salander v. Clarke
as 2:2015cv00307
Petitioner:
Richard Philip Salander
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Protective Specialty Insurance Company v. Alain Pinel Realtors, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04524
Plaintiff:
Protective Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Alain Pinel Realtors, Inc., APR Real Estate Services, Inc., APR Referral Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KAUFMAN
as 2:2011mc00083
Bunger v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv02623
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Richard Philip Bunger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KAUFMAN et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2010cv01610
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PHILIP KAUFMAN and MICHAEL NORLEY
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT 32-2-49 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
