Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McNatt v. Prince et al
as 1:2016cv08896
Plaintiff:
Eric McNatt
Defendant:
Richard Prince , Blum & Poe New York, LLC, Ocula Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ashley Salazar v. Richard Prince et al
as 2:2016cv04282
Defendant:
DOES, Gagosian Gallery, Inc. and Richard Prince
Plaintiff:
Ashley Salazar
Dennis Morris, LLC v. Richard Prince et al
as 2:2016cv03924
Plaintiff:
Dennis Morris, LLC
Defendant:
Does, Gagosian Gallery, Inc. and Richard Prince
Graham v. Prince et al
as 1:2015cv10160
Plaintiff:
Donald Graham
Defendant:
Richard Prince , Gagosian Gallery, Inc. and Lawrence Gagosian
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Prince et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv15686
Plaintiff:
Pamela Prince and Richard Prince
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cariou v. Prince et al
as 1:2008cv11327
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cariou
Defendant:
Richard Prince, Gagosian Gallery, Inc., Lawrence Gagosian and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc., The Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, American Society of Media Photographers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 cp Copyright Infringement
Cariou v. Prince
as 11-1197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Patrick Cariou
Defendant - Appellant:
Richard Prince, Gagosian Gallery, Inc. and Lawrence Gagosian
Prince et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04056
Plaintiff:
Daphne Prince and Richard Prince
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richard Quinney v. USA
as 12-12936
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD PRINCE QUINNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Quinney v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv08046
Petitioner:
Richard Prince Quinney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
