Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fowler v. Indect USA Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10227
Defendant:
Richard Schreiner, Indect USA Corporation and Ingo Herwich
Plaintiff:
Dale Fowler
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HERZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00023
Defendant:
P. FREDERICK PFENNINGER, BERNARD PYLITT, DENNIS SASSO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2018cv03447
Defendant:
P. FREDERICK PFENNINGER, JUDGE MARC ROTHENBERG, BERNARD PYLITT and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. RIFKIN et al
as 1:2018cv02120
Defendant:
RICHARD SCHREINER, JONATHAN ADLAND, JOHN HANLEY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00496
Defendant:
MARK BANNATYNE, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01383
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO, JAY BRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2012cv01309
Defendant:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Srivastava v. Herz et al
as 3:2010cv00853
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant:
Marian Herz, Retirement Living, Inc., Donahoe Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Srivastava PHD v. Daniels et al
as 2:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Carolyn H Srivastava PHD
Defendant:
Mitchell Daniels, Randall Shepard, Gregory Zoeller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
