Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-40612
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ricky Clay Jones
Defendant / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, H. M. Pederson and S. Sanchez, Assistant Regional Director
Jones v. Dettelbach
as 4:2023cv11572
Plaintiff: Ricky Lynn Jones, Jr
Defendant: Steven Dettelbach
Jones v. Lumpkin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00152
Plaintiff: Ricky Clay Jones
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin, H.M. Pederson and S. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Correct-Care Solutions, et al. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00070
Plaintiff: Ricky Bernard Jones
Defendant: Correct-Care Solutions, et al., Wellpath, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hemingway et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv10842
Plaintiff: Ricky L. Jones and Antonio Lynn Fluker
Defendant: Jonathan Hemingway, J. Grimsley and J. Fisher
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff: Ricky Clay Jones
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin, H.M. Pederson and S. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12455
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ricky Clay Jones v. Bobby Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv01014
Petitioner: Ricky Clay Jones
Respondent: Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv00119
Petitioner: Ricky Clay Jones
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin and Director Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11972
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?