Labor Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Casal v. Kabaker Holdings LLC
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff: Carolina Casal
Defendant: Kabaker Holdings LLC doing business as One River Lake Oswego
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust v. Northwest Refrigeration Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters' Trust and Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust
Defendant: Northwest Refrigeration Services, LLC, Jamie Burke Macki, Molly Susanne Macki and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Su v. Thompson et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: Julie A. Su
Defendant: Mark Thompson, Granite Mountain Restaurants, LLC a limited liability company (d/b/a "Mackenzie River Pizza"), MRP Idaho Falls, LLC a limited liability company (d/b/a "Mackenzie River Pizza") and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Board of Trustees of the Southern Nevada and California Glaziers, Fabricators, Painters and Floorcoverers Pension Trust Fund v. Decor Interior Design, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Southern Nevada and California Glaziers, Fabricators, Painters and Floorcoverers Pension Trust Fund
Defendant: Decor Interior Design, Inc. and The North River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Sanchez
as 3:2022cv09029
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Pension Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Apprentice Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Abel Sanchez, North River Insurance Company and The North River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Jiang et al v. Kobe Hibachi Sushi Hood River Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01768
Plaintiff: Xiu Yong Jiang, Zhou Fan Jiang, Tu Kun Yang and others
Defendant: Kobe Hibachi Sushi Hood River Inc., Kobe Hibachi Sushi, Inc., Kobe Hibachi Sushi The Dalles and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
Thomas v. Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00423
Plaintiff: Kevin Thomas
Defendant: Wood River Drilling and Pump, Inc. and Brandon Freeman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Custom Spray Systems, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv09976
Plaintiff: Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Defendant: Custom Spray Systems, Inc., Wesco Insurance Company and The North River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hooks v. Hood River Distillers, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00268
Respondent: Hood River Distillers Inc and Hood River Distillers, Inc.
Petitioner: Regional Director Ronald K. Hooks and Ronald K. Hooks
Amicus Curiae: Board of Trustees of the Oregon Processors Employees Trust Fund and Teamster Food Processors, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers, Local Union No. 670
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Cosentino v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District and the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association Insured Health & Life Benefit Plan et al
as 2:2021cv00180
Plaintiff: Frank Cosentino
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District and the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association Insured Health & Life Benefit Plan and Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?