Cases 1 - 10 of 10
R Street Institute v. Rizer d/b/a ARrow Consulting, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Arthur Rizer d/b/a ARrow Consulting, LLC and Rizer Consulting, LLC
Plaintiff:
R Street Institute
Frazier v. Rizer et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Lt. Rizer, Mrs. Boyd White and Warden Calvin Wilson
Plaintiff:
Sydni Donnell Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Frazier v. Rizer et al
as 1:2020cv03311
Defendant:
Lt. Rizer, Ms. Boyo-White and Warden Calvin Wilson
Plaintiff:
Sydni D. Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tice v. Rizer
as 3:2020cv01005
Defendant:
Nathan R. Rizer
Plaintiff:
Joseph Charles Tice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rizer v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10666
Plaintiff:
Charlotte A. Rizer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rizer et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv30550
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Rizer, Jr. and Trish Diane Rizer
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rizer v. The Town of Warrenton Virginia et al
as 1:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey K. Rizer
Defendant:
The Town of Warrenton Virginia , The Town Council of the Town of Warrenton and The Planning Commission of the Town of Warrenton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rizer v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05128
Plaintiff:
Renae Lynn Rizer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rizer v. C&H Distributors LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02103
Plaintiff:
John Henry Rizer
Defendant:
C&H Distributors LLC , C&H Furniture Co and Relius Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Olson v. The City of Hagerstown Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv01545
Plaintiff:
Phillip Thane Olson, Jr.
Defendant:
The City of Hagerstown Police Department, The City of Hagerstown Fire Dept., Duffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
