Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00610
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dandridge v. Ohl et al
as 2:2018cv02039
Plaintiff:
Dana L Dandridge
Defendant:
Connie Ohl, Gavin Earp and Robert A McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peters v. USA et al
as 3:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
USA, David Shulkin, Robert A. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Indiana Forest Alliance Incor, et al v. Robert McDonald, et al
as 17-1120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE INCORPORATED, INDIANA INTERCHURCH CENTER, VETERANS IN INDUSTRY AND ARTS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. MCDONALD, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, RONALD E. WALTERS, Interim Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs, National Cemetery Association and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE et al v. MCDONALD et al
as 1:2016cv03297
Plaintiff:
MARY T. BOOKWALTER, INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE, INDIANA INTERCHURCH CENTER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT A. MCDONALD, NATIONAL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
