Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Scott v. Diener et al
as 4:2014cv13159
Plaintiff:
Gary Scott
Defendant:
Robert B. Diener , Donald J. Hager , Linda Lee-Dynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. Diener et al
as 1:2014cv13159
Plaintiff:
Gary Scott and Linda Albohn
Defendant:
Robert B. Diener, Donald J. Hager, Linda Lee-Dynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. University of Massachusetts, et al
as 13-1269
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTINE M. ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL, ARTHUR K. BREWER, Regional Director, Correctional Health Program, University of Mass Medical School, KENNETH APPLEBAUM, Director, Mental Health Program, University of Mass Medical School and others
Defendant:
JILL DECOSTE, REBECCA LUBELCZYK, HEIDI HERRICK-LYNN and others
Interested Party:
ROBERT FERREIRA and CHOATE, HALL & STEWART
Jamimani v. Diener et al
as 1:2012cv10201
Plaintiff:
Chosen One Jamimani
Defendant:
Robert B Diener, Deval Patrick, Thomas Menino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wittkowski v. Spencer et al
as 1:2012cv10115
Plaintiff:
JoJo Wittkowski
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Gary Roden, Robert B Diener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer, Jr. v. Obama, et al
as 11-1695
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARRY H. SPENCER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, ROBERT B. PLOUTTE and others
Spencer, Jr. v. Obama et al
as 1:2011cv10591
Petitioner:
Barry H. Spencer, Jr.
Respondent:
Barack H. Obama, Eric Holder, Frances A. McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
LITMAN et al v. USA
as 1:2005cv00956
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. LITMAN , MALIA A. LITMAN , MICHELLE S. DIENER and others
Defendant:
USA
Counter_claimant:
USA
Counter_defendant:
DAVID S. LITMAN and MALIA A. LITMAN
Consolidated_plaintiff:
HOTELS.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
